Sep 9, 05:20 PM by Steve | What's in a Number, Anyway?

Posted in &

Some of you may have been following the thread on Bikeforums or seen Tom’s comments about the calibration issues I’ve been having with my new Quarq power meter. Tom has been helping me out with the analysis of the numbers and Quarq is sending me a new unit so that they can analyze mine. From all the tests (static torque) and calculations (OSM) I have done, it appears to be reading about 15% low, fairly consistently. It’s a little comforting, because it means my 895W sprint test on Saturday was really more like 1050W. Still pathetic, yes, but in my mind I figured I should at least be able to break 1KW. Maybe there’s hope for me yet. The new one is on its way and should arrive Wednesday. I’ll do a static torque test and then take it up OSM and calculate the difference.

The chart I had posted the other day that showed my performance vs. training stress was calculated assuming an FTP of 250W, which I had estimated by analyzing my performances on a long climb (Gibraltar), and by looking a few days worth of ride data. Of course I was considerably “in the hole” stress-balance-wise, so it’s not surprising that I was not able to reach my full potential. It has been made clear to me through much heckling that my FTP must be higher, so I bumped it up to 275W in WKO+.

Keeping in mind that everything is still 15% low, this is what I got from today’s “hammerfest” ride. I felt like I had decent midrange power but no jump and no stamina, which I attribute to coming off being sick yesterday… However, and this is the coolest part about having the power meter, is that even though I felt like crap, the numbers were actually pretty good, including the best 5m power I’ve seen so far:

Entire workout (201 watts)

Duration 59:30
Work 686 kJ
TSS 75.8 (intensity factor 0.897)
Norm Power 247
VI 1.22
Pw:HR 14.28%
Pa:HR -7.45%
Distance 20.253 mi

Channel Min Max Avg
Power 0 778 203 watts
Heart Rate 92 191 161 bpm
Cadence 1 114 84 rpm
Speed 0 49.3 21.8 mph
Crank Torque 0 796 202 lb-in

Peak

Duration Watts Normalized
5s 711
10s 644
20s 533
30s 496
1m 438
2m 360
5m 304 342
10m 246 294
20m 228 279
30m 217 266

Name
E-mail
http://
Message
  Textile Help



Kim & Steve>What's in a Number, Anyway? | | | About | Gallery | Feed
© 2004-2008 by Kimberly & Steven Weixel | Hosted by Pair | Powered by Textpattern 4.0.6 | Log in